Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoHee Hee Ho Ho Ha Halemmy.worldimagemessage-square423fedilinkarrow-up1998arrow-down1138
arrow-up1860arrow-down1imageHee Hee Ho Ho Ha Halemmy.worldChippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square423fedilink
minus-squareScrooLewse@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down2·2 days agoActually, if you want a real answer, that which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. So, wrong.
minus-squareChippys_mittens@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down12·2 days agoWhat do you mean?
minus-squareScrooLewse@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·2 days agoIf someone explains something you disagree with, you have to actually explain why you think they’re wrong. Conversely, if you just say ‘nuh uh’, then ‘nuh uh’ is enough to prove you completely wrong.
minus-squareChippys_mittens@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down6·2 days agoI didn’t disagree with anything
minus-squareScrooLewse@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoAmnesia moment
Actually, if you want a real answer, that which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
So, wrong.
What do you mean?
If someone explains something you disagree with, you have to actually explain why you think they’re wrong. Conversely, if you just say ‘nuh uh’, then ‘nuh uh’ is enough to prove you completely wrong.
I didn’t disagree with anything
Amnesia moment