• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There are many things that people are willing to do for their own satisfaction, I don’t disagree with that. I don’t think waste disposal is one of them.

    The “communal life” you’re talking about cannot exist in an urbanised society, because most people you affect in a city are not personally known to you, and there will be no opportunity for the social mechanisms we evolved to pressure us into doing the right thing. In a village of 200 people, if you throw your shit in the street, your neighbour, whom you know personally and whose opinion you likely care about, will complain. In a city of 2 million, if someone throws shit in the street you have no idea who it was, they’ve never met you, and what are you gonna do about it anyway?

    Anyway, I should bow out now. I have no interest in discussing politics or economics with an anarchist.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      because most people you affect in a city are not personally known to you, and there will be no opportunity for the social mechanisms we evolved to pressure us into doing the right thing

      That’s a demonstrable bullshit. Believing that the only motivation people can have is the fear of repercussions is the same level of that christian psychotic “if it wasn’t for the fear of god everyone would be raping and killing all the time” that says more about you than about supposed issue you’re afraid of.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s not fear of repercussions; it’s social glue. Crime is much more common in cities, out of proportion with how many people there are, because people who are willing to commit crime are not willing to commit it against people they know personally. Urbanisation allows depersonalisation allows bad behaviour.

        It also allows effects to be transmitted that are simply way less direct than you have any hope of instinct being able to reckon with. Like, you can work out that tossing shit out of your window will piss off your neighbour, but the knock-on-effects of what you do can be harder to figure out than that. Did you buy a little bit more of anything at the start of COVID, “just in case”?

    • bearboiblake@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Do you really believe everyone would act like a psychopath if they aren’t always directly accountable for their actions? And how does that differ from our current system?

      I have no interest in discussing politics or economics with an anarchist.

      That’s really too bad, because I’m sure you’d learn a lot! Anarchism is not what you think it is. Either way, have a great day, I wish you all the best. Solidarity forever!

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Do you really believe everyone would act like a psychopath if they aren’t accountable for their actions?

        No.