• greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    flipside: Using it costs elon money.

    we should be attacking his wallet by asking Grok more banal questions.

    • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Inference is dirt cheap. Short of a botnet, nothing we do will at all impact Grok’s finances.

      EDIT: I haven’t actually done the math if it is actually dirt cheap. But assuming it isn’t, then that makes it even more important not to use such a carbon-intensive AI.

      • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Short of a botnet

        Well, yeah. Or a browser extension that can be circulated.

        Generating images and video are hella computationally expensive. requesting it to make millions of junk images will make a non-zero economic impact.

        Its also why sora got killed off.

        The carbon intensity wont make the product go away, but the economic cost will.

        • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The carbon intensity wont make the product go away, but the economic cost will.

          The product won’t go away either way. I can’t foresee a scenario where Musk kills Grok. Short of a catastrophic global energy crisis that makes anything AI basically impossible to sustain, but that’d never happen.