criss_cross@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 hours agoClass 5 Free Forming Vaporlemmy.worldimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1215arrow-down17
arrow-up1208arrow-down1imageClass 5 Free Forming Vaporlemmy.worldcriss_cross@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 hours agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squaredellhiver@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up15·edit-22 hours agoWas it necessary to make AI Ghostbusters? Left: Harold (something is) rAmiss Middle: Bill MurrAIy Right: Dan Faykroyd Also, the model was absolutely NOT trained on copyrighted material.
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-22 hours agoDamn thought it was photoshopped. It’s been a week and didn’t pay good attention. Not the person that made it originally. EDIT: wow the ai generation is reaaal bad.
minus-squaredellhiver@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-22 hours agoTis ok. Scrolling past this image on a phone you don’t really notice (i almost didn’t). Harold Ramis is close to correct. Still think the original OP could have just used AI to cut-out the characters from the background of the movie frame instead.
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 hours agoWholeheartedly agree. I prefer shitty photoshops to AI
Was it necessary to make AI Ghostbusters?
Also, the model was absolutely NOT trained on copyrighted material.
Damn thought it was photoshopped. It’s been a week and didn’t pay good attention.
Not the person that made it originally.
EDIT: wow the ai generation is reaaal bad.
Tis ok. Scrolling past this image on a phone you don’t really notice (i almost didn’t). Harold Ramis is close to correct.
Still think the original OP could have just used AI to cut-out the characters from the background of the movie frame instead.
Wholeheartedly agree. I prefer shitty photoshops to AI