• LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can I ask why people still use dedicated email software? I’m sure there’s a reason. Maybe just familiarity, but I’ve never once opened my email inbox from anything other than a browser. It seems like a royal PITA.

        • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          if you have more than one email account, then one of these applications becomes critical. Also, in all the years thunderbird has been out it’s UI/UX has gone largely unchanged unlike the microsoft and google browser clients that seem to change every few years

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      People have their preferences for UI and UX. I use Aerc because I like modal editing (ie being able to write my emails in vim) and keyboard nav. Using a desktop email client rather than webmail client from a provider gives me that freedom.

      Besides, I don’t actually have a webmail client I can use lol. I host my own email and host the IMAP server but I don’t host a web interface.

    • ian@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I much prefer a client for usability reasons. My email provider has a poor web ui. I guess I’d need to change my email address to get round it. I tried the google web enail which was also bad. But google never care about UX. It also needed to refresh a web page on each click, where the client app is instant.

      I can work offline.

    • cevn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can see the use case for gmail at least. I tried to access web interface from India and it loaded like for 2 solid minutes before showing up completely unresponsive. I could have had it 10 times faster with a dedicated IMAP client.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s odd, since they used to have a rather nice HTML web interface specifically for low-peformance devices, but it’s since gone away.

    • northernlights@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Familiarity, better integration in the desktop, generally many more options (including extensions) than web versions, UI better adapted to a desktop computer, better at managing multiple accounts, are my reasons. I like Betterbird personally.

    • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Ultimately Email is old technology, all the web frontends just get in the way more or less.

      I use an email host that has roadmapped switching their frontend to one I don’t really like, so figured I’d get ahead of the curve and switch to a client that was open source and compatible with the typical standards — so I could learn it and never have to deal with another client again.

      Ended up using Thunderbird, even for my old inboxes at the typical web companies

      One client, all my emails in one spot, don’t have to deal with stupid UX changes being forced on users.