• Arcanoloth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nice April 1st. I mean that’d be almost as ridiculous as running nuclear subs on Windows, right? Long EOL’d versions at that, eh?

    rustles papers

    Oh.

      • PhatalFlaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 day ago

        On the stream you could very easily see his PIN code being put in, hopefully it’s limited to that device!

        • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Of course a submarine’s systems won’t be connected to the internet, but using a Windows base with a “Custom Support Agreement” still gives a private US corporation the power to cripple their subs.
          IMO something so critical to defense should be built by British developers, and based on OpenBSD.

          • supamanc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Further to this, there isn’t a ‘launch the nuclear weapons’ application which controls things. Windows is used for the day to day admin - producing the paperwork required in any organisation - but the actual control systems, for the submarine, the weapons the reactor etc are not running off windows.

          • gnutrino@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            gives a private US corporation the power to cripple their subs.

            You, umm, probably shouldn’t look up who maintains the trident missiles those subs carry…

              • RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                24 hours ago

                I bet it’s Adobe. Turns out making or maintaining nukes isn’t really that hard or expensive. It’s just the subscription to Adobe Apocalypse that’s the real blocker for most economies.

          • Arcanoloth@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I agree, but then I’m one of those really hardcore libre-software-only nutcases ;-)

            EDIT: Though, to be fair, the Trident Missiles they carry are US-made, too, so…

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            using a Windows base with a “Custom Support Agreement” still gives a private US corporation the power to cripple their subs.

            No, it doesn’t.

            How is Microsoft going to affect the software installed on a nuclear submarine?

            It only gives Microsoft the power to choose to not add new features, the software wouldn’t be on the sub if it required any kind of outside support… the entire point of a nuclear submarine is to perform a second strike after everyone (including Microsoft) is destroyed in a nuclear apocalypse.

            Having software that’s dependent on anything that isn’t on the boat would completely defeat that purpose.