kewwwi@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agodyklemmy.worldimagemessage-square152fedilinkarrow-up1731arrow-down128
arrow-up1703arrow-down1imagedyklemmy.worldkewwwi@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square152fedilink
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoBiology, legality and philosophy all disagree with your assertion that a dead body is equivalent to random inanimate objects. It’s human remains. A deceased individual. A corpse. You do not get to treat it on the same level as a shoe.
minus-squareminorkeys@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 days agoBiology and philosophy absolutely do not disagree. Some parts of philosophy, yes. Biologically they are a pile of complex organic matter that is unbinding.
Biology, legality and philosophy all disagree with your assertion that a dead body is equivalent to random inanimate objects.
It’s human remains. A deceased individual. A corpse. You do not get to treat it on the same level as a shoe.
Biology and philosophy absolutely do not disagree. Some parts of philosophy, yes. Biologically they are a pile of complex organic matter that is unbinding.