• kossa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    It doesn’t seem feasible to break them up into smaller companies, how would that even work?

    It is a shame how uncreative we as a society have become to deal with monopolies.

    Remember when Microsoft almost got divided over bundling a browser with their OS? 'Cause Pepperidge Farm remembers 😅

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Uh, Microsoft got in trouble for making their browser an unremovable part of the operating system, and aggressively trying to force you to use it as a browser. Not remotely accurate to say the problem was just including a web browser. And in the end, they got barely any punishment for it.

      • kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Erm

        The central issue was whether Microsoft was allowed to bundle its IE web browser software with its Windows operating system

        They even had the same shit going on some 15 years later in the EU.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I don’t care if someone oversimplified it that way in a wikipedia article. That doesn’t make it the full story. Notice the modifier “central” in any case.

    • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What’s your point?

      Are you saying that Microsoft being split up made no sense? If so, what would you suggest instead?

      Or are you saying since they “almost” did it to MS, then they could do it to Steam? If so, where do you make the split that effects any change? You could split Valve the game dev company from the Steam platform, but I don’t think that makes Steam any less monolithic in their space - they don’t get their market share from the games Valve has made.

      • kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You could split Valve Dev from Distribution from Hardware. But that is a shitty split, I’m with you.

        You could also just say: you have three years to split distribution into, idk, 4 subsidaries which are then “released” as own companies.

        You could split geographically, and down the line those companies might compete with each other.

        That’s what I mean with creativity. A lot of shit could be possible. But here we are and are told “it makes no sense”, “there is no alternative”, just crippling our own imagination before even using it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        There might be. But back tn the day we just knew that monopolies are shit for everyone (except the owner). So maybe we should sharpen that tool of law once again. But who am I kidding, not gonna happen.

        • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I mean, it definitely isn’t going to happen in the US anytime soon… We haven’t had any teeth behind our anti-trust laws in decades. In my lifetime we have basically seen Bell Telephone get rebuilt under AT&T.