0485@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 hours agoBitwarden 100% price increasewww.fastcompany.comexternal-linkmessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1189arrow-down17
arrow-up1182arrow-down1external-linkBitwarden 100% price increasewww.fastcompany.com0485@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 hours agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·10 hours agoI can’t think of a reason to choose Bit/Vaultwarden over Keepass.
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-24 hours agoNot really and not nearly at the same level
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 hours agoYes and more easily
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 hour agoLol, no. The mess of databases you would need to replicate what is simple with organizations and collections is definitely not easier or more flexible.
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 minutes agolol yes It’s just one database file
I can’t think of a reason to choose Bit/Vaultwarden over Keepass.
Shared passwords
Easy to do on Keepass
Not really and not nearly at the same level
Yes and more easily
Lol, no.
The mess of databases you would need to replicate what is simple with organizations and collections is definitely not easier or more flexible.
lol yes
It’s just one database file