• Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I hate how the settings app is taking over control panel entries to make them worse and show me the original control panel window after going down 3 levels because the stupid fucks can’t design UI for shit.

    Thankfully, you can still get to a lot of them if you know the name of the control panel applet.

    • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      IKR? I spent multiple hours looking for GPU switching whitelist because some moron in MS put it under “Display” instead of GPU settings or Power Management

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Ncpa.cpl > right click > properties and go from there is my main method.

        Otherwise, Win+X > G (devmgmt.msc) and look at the network adapter in device manager

        Other than the win+x chord, that works on just about every version I have to touch

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Heh, I’m a windows sysadmin, so I use them often enough to know it from memory. I’m almost entirely Linux at home these days as well

    • Haquer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Fighting with their shitty “new” UI trying to find the old Sound UI to fix an issue that their new UI doesn’t even have a toggle for really chapped my ass.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Apparently there’s a ton of CBT involved in doing anything in the new Settings app, so it makes sense to only bring over the things you absolutely have to and then send people to the old control panel for the rest.

      • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Windows 7 was IMO decent. Didn’t deviate too much from the old one, and you could still reconfigure it to have same UI style as Windows XP.

        Now if you want similar UI get yourself Linux with KDE desktop

        • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That’s the thing… 7 is Vista. Just with a new UI.

          Windows 2000 is XP. XP just has a new interface. 7 and XP are for consumers. 2000 and Vista are more like server editions (even the pro versions.)

          Vista has Aero but also the classic server(windows NT/2000) UI. Even modern server versions have essentially the same classic control panels. And server versions don’t have all the extra bullshit(7 wasn’t so bad yet, but 10 and 11 are). That’s why I prefer to run Windows server as my desktop.

          What made Vista/7 great were the under the hood(kernel) improvements, particularly to the threading model. They made safe handling non-negotiable. This retroactively fixed countless programs and improved overall system stability significantly.

          There’s really no other major differences between Vista and 7 besides aesthetics(the shell.)

        • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Win98 good

          Windows 2000 bad

          WindowsXP good

          Vista bad

          Win7 good (maybe peak)

          Win8 bad

          Win10 OK?

          Win11 bad