• Senal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    i’m also on slrpnk.net (same username) though i’m much more a lurker over there.

    I’m all for the “everything is political” position, at least where animals are concerned (people are also animals).

    I wasn’t asking that question in seriousness but your points are interesting.

    I’d think all the examples you provided are people politics , with a grass subject.

    I think what i meant was “is physical grass inherently political” but i haven’t thought this all the way through tbh.

    I get that grass as a concept can be (and is) a political subject, but the physical grass itself ?

    Like, can physical objects be inherently political if you take them outside of external political influences (people stuff)?

    Hmm, i shall have to think about this one.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The type of grass that is so predominant is because of stupid social views of what a house/yard is supposed to look like.

      The fact that a lot of HOA’s and even some cities ban yards being used to grow anything but grass should tell you have political it is.

      As all mentioned by The D Quuuuuill.