• teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They want to be able to remotely disable vehicles, but in the process have made us vulnerable to all sophisticated actors to do so. Our leaders have their priorities all screwed up.

      • Archr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Not sure that I would really agree that these are backdoor. Since disabling the vehicle remotely is kinda the express intention of this device. Just a consequence of how they designed them to not be circumvented by the operator.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Since disabling the vehicle remotely is kinda the express intention of this device

          Uhhh nope, there’s no reason for a remote connection.