• UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The one reason this weirds me out (without having seen these dolls tbf) is that it was decided something sex-related is too childlike and that somehow makes it illegal apparently? Like, what legal basis is there for it? I have never heard about any law prohibiting ‘too childlike’ appearance, let alone seen it applied.

    I mean, have these people seen what’s going on in some (not to say many) anime? There are characters being explicitly sexualized, while being canonically underage. How is one thing okay and the other isn’t?

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Neither are, and animated materiel depicting children in a sexual way is illegal in many places.

      It’s actually pretty consistent with the laws in many countries, animated child porn and child sex dolls are vile, and anyone arguing against that should be put on a list.