• jeffep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Great response, given that the alternative was to double down and take the lifelong commitment to the path of misogyny

    • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      i think he is referring to the strength of her prescription. a -1 or -1.5 diopter prescription is mild - i.e. her glasses aren’t strong enough for the person she offered them to. misogyny was not intended

    • Buffy@libretechni.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      What? I think you missed what he is saying like the reply to him. He was talking about her glasses not her looks. If he doubled down it would have just been him explaining what he meant and that would be that.

    • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      I’m assuming you are talking about Ethan but I’m not sure how misogyny or shitting on someone talking about glasses are the only 2 options?