• shrek_is_love@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    I know this is a meme and not GitHub, but I thought some people might like to learn that if you do please shutdown && thanks it won’t say you’re welcome if the shutdown failed

    • juipeltje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wait, isn’t it the other way around? I thought ; only executed the next command if the previous one succeeded, and && executed the next command regardless of exit status.

      • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Partly right in bash:

        set -e; echo 1; echo 2;
        

        is the same as

        echo 1 && echo 2
        

        So if you see the -e in a script, it’s to keep the function clean.

        • juipeltje@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ah yes you’re right, had to look it up to see for myself. It’s weird because i remember specifically changing some of my &&s for ; instead because i wanted it to not continue if exit wasn’t zero, but i must’ve misread it at the time. Time to change it back i guess lol.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            It makes more sense if you think of semicolons like other programming languages like Java and C use it.

            foo();
            bar();
            

            But those languages allow foo(); bar(); as well. Then && works like a normal short circuited expression (with side effects).