• lalo@discuss.tchncs.de
    12·
    2 hours ago

    Of course they don’t, that’s why I used the word “but”. Now you also realized why I named them “hoomans” instead of “humans”. Good one!

    Kinda like we can say “odd numbers are the integers but the multiples of 2”. “But” meaning “removed”, “without”.

    Are you gonna answer any of my questions? I don’t want other people to have the impression that you avoid questions, but I’m afraid this deep in the thread they might feel like you’re avoiding answering.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      1·
      2 hours ago

      I have already answered all of them. No one can answer the “question” (invalid due to the flaws I’ve identified that haven’t been addressed) that concerns the “hooman”. I would answer it if it could be answered.

      And yeah I’m really not worried about that being the impression folks take away from this conversation 🤣

      • lalo@discuss.tchncs.de
        11·
        2 hours ago

        I’m really not worried about that being the impression folks take away from this conversation

        I grant you that.

        Now please remind me what was your answer to “If I own a human slave, me artificially inseminating them without consent isn’t rape?”.

        Also please point out the concern with the second question that went unaddressed.

          • lalo@discuss.tchncs.de
            11·
            1 hour ago

            You can’t specifically point to your answer to my question because you haven’t answered it. So I’ll pose if for the third time:

            If I own a human slave, me artificially inseminating them without consent isn’t rape?

            The same way you can’t point to a concern that I left unaddressed, because there isn’t. So I’ll pose it for the third time as well:

            If I DNA test the slave from earlier and discover they aren’t human, inseminating them without consent wouldn’t be rape?