R3N5656@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 days agoNo need to reproduce 💜lemmy.worldimagemessage-square32linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageNo need to reproduce 💜lemmy.worldR3N5656@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square32linkfedilink
minus-squareAliOski@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days agoThe title of the post ruined the meme. If it were just the picture it would be funny.
minus-squaretamal3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days agoAgreed. Any idea where the picture came from? I really like the 70s saturated storybook look.
minus-squarenforminvasion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoIt’s most likely AI slop from the 2025 dark fantasy core/aesthetic on social media.
minus-squaretamal3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoThanks. Also, lol, I got downvoted for liking it. People are nuts.
minus-squarerestingOface@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 days agoI didn’t understand it until I read the title
minus-squareAliOski@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days agoThe vagueness is what made it funny, you could interpret it in multiple ways, but the implication of “being enough” meaning “not needing more of you” was in itself funny. Making a remark that you shouldn’t reproduce is just distasteful.
The title of the post ruined the meme. If it were just the picture it would be funny.
Agreed. Any idea where the picture came from? I really like the 70s saturated storybook look.
It’s most likely AI slop from the 2025 dark fantasy core/aesthetic on social media.
Thanks. Also, lol, I got downvoted for liking it. People are nuts.
I didn’t understand it until I read the title
The vagueness is what made it funny, you could interpret it in multiple ways, but the implication of “being enough” meaning “not needing more of you” was in itself funny. Making a remark that you shouldn’t reproduce is just distasteful.