(yes, this is a real post by someone who also happened to have actually been arrested for gene editing embryos)

  • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    OED:

    1. totally or partially resistant to a particular infectious disease or pathogen.
    2. protected or exempt, especially from an obligation or the effects of something.

    Merriam Webster

    1. : not susceptible or responsive

      especially: having a high degree of resistance to a disease

    2. a: produced by, involved in, or concerned with immunity or an immune response

      b: having or producing antibodies or lymphocytes capable of reacting with a specific antigen

    3. a: marked by protection

      b: free, exempt

    So unless you pretend that MW’s 2b sense is the only valid one, the immunity is immunity.

    If you have a sample of HIV at 37°C in blood, but with all the immune cells removed, it’ll still all become inert after around a week simply due to chemical reactions with other components of blood etc… It’s pretty comparable to a population of animals - if you take away their ability to reproduce, they’ll die of old age when left for long enough even if you’re not actively killing them.

    Edit: fat-fingered the save button while previewing the formatting

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Context is how you determine definitions. This is not hard. We’re not talking about legal immunity here.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        And the context was a sentence that was correct if you used OED sense 1, or MW sense 1, but you decided to parse it as MW sense 2b and then complain that the sentence was incorrect.