Clair Obscur won multiple awards but used generative AI art as placeholders during production.

The Indie Game Awards revoked Clair Obscur’s Debut and Game of the Year after the AI disclosure.

IGAs reassigned the awards (Blue Prince, Sorry We’re Closed) and reignited debate on gen-AI use.

  • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    People keep saying the problem ‘wasnt that they used AI placeholder assets, it’s that they lied on the disclosure’, but boy does that still seem like a reach

    When you have dozens of people working on a huge creative project, it would take an almost omniscient creative director to know where every asset in every scene came from with certainty. It isn’t hard to imagine a designer somewhere on the team sneaking an AI asset into a pre-release build and forgetting about it. The fact that it was later disclosed suggests that whoever was applying for the award wasn’t aware of that asset being used and then replaced at the time of submission.

    I dont mind having some awards dedicated to genAI-free works, but people really need to stop getting their pitchforks out at every mention, otherwise they risk turning into a lynch mob. This doesnt sound like an intentional omission to me.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t know where you got the idea that they just didn’t know. They were DQ’d because they DID KNOW there was AI used.

      • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m still not arguing against their disqualification, I’m saying people need to lay off the sauce - it’s not hard to imagine how this could have been accidental and not malicious.

        We don’t need to torch an effigy every time a studio mentions AI in an interview.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I am inclined to agree except it wasn’t intentionally later disclosed. From my understanding, they gave an interview and mentioned it briefly. If they did end up disclosing it to the awards, it wasn’t until the day that they were announced as the winner. That’s kind of icky.

      But I do agree with you that whoever spoke to the award committee probably didn’t even know about it.

      • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Still, there’s a lot of room there for some grace. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to strip them of the award, but the level of outrage I’m seeing in this thread and elsewhere isn’t proportionate to the offense.

        People really need to chill with this.