pepsi_not_coke@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 hours agoFoot In The Doorsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1504arrow-down16
arrow-up1498arrow-down1imageFoot In The Doorsh.itjust.workspepsi_not_coke@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 hours agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squarefloquant@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 hours agoI am sure there has to be some significance to this non-censor that is so common. Like a very thin line that doesn’t cover the word or a single dot that partly covers a single letter. Maybe seeing who complains to distinguish people and bots?
minus-squareMummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoIt’s to get past AI censors. It’s like a captcha for reading swear words.
minus-squarefloquant@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·47 minutes agoNo AI or basic OCR would fail to recognize the words. Oldschool captchas have been inefficient at stopping bots for years now
I am sure there has to be some significance to this non-censor that is so common. Like a very thin line that doesn’t cover the word or a single dot that partly covers a single letter. Maybe seeing who complains to distinguish people and bots?
It’s to get past AI censors. It’s like a captcha for reading swear words.
No AI or basic OCR would fail to recognize the words. Oldschool captchas have been inefficient at stopping bots for years now