It’s wild just how much they’re trying to shove AI down our throats.

  • VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Who’s going to step up and start creating a “dumb” version of absolutely everything? One brand dedicated to just making the thing do the thing it absolutely must do and nothing else.

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Would be great but the manufacturer would be at a disadvantage because that bundled bullshit effectively subsidizes the device. So you’d have to either raise prices or accept a lower profit margin.

      Due to the high barrier of entry (e.g. because of patents) it’s unlikely that a privately owned company can make a big market entry, especially across countries. And a public company will be forced by the shareholders to maximize profit so either you bundle crapware or they fire you as CEO.

      Of course if you look outside the TV market such devices already exist. High-quality digital signage devices can easily be had – for about three times the price of an equivalently-sized TV.

      • scala@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Wonder if avoiding the HDMI forum and only having open source ports like DP would reduce cost.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It might but most devices only use HDMI. DP is pretty much only used by PCs.

          Maybe the GPMI consortium decides to make their standard open; that might help. But I don’t see DP catching up to HDMI; HDMI is too entrenched.

      • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        So you’d have to either raise prices or accept a lower profit margin.

        Isn’t that the point and the main benefit of competitive markets?

        Agreed, regarding barriers to entry though. They need to be addressed.

      • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Why do they need incoming profit after the purchase? We’ve had single purchases for 70 years and they’ve done fine. Set the price above the price of materials. Boom profit. Transaction over.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I don’t know if they get a share or if they get a flat payment for every device that has crap preinstalled. Either way, not doing it would reduce profits and therefore go against the interest of the shareholders who would then have grounds to the CEO for failing to do their job.

          I’m very much unhappy with how that works but it’s a consequence of how publicly traded companies work. Companies that make it their legally binding goal to maximize shareholder gains attract more investors, have more money, and are thus more effective in increasing their market share. Over time they outcompete their rivals until the market is dominated by maximally profitable companies.

          At that point, shit-free products are only available if there is a clear indication that they will generate more profit than shitty products. And the handful of major players will happily collude to make sure only shitty products enter the market, increasing profits for everyone. Welcome to cartelville, population: the three companies that make up 95% of the world market.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Some premium brands like Bang & Olufsen sell TVs without adware, I think Panasonic TVs are mostly ad-free for now. Outside of that, most big brands will have “professional” or “commercial” product lines that also don’t have ads. But in all cases you’ll have to pay extra over the TVs subsidized by ads.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        10 hours ago

        pay extra over the TVs subsidized by ads.

        Let’s be very clear, they are not and never were “subsidised by ads”. Ads just became a new way to extract more money from customers.

      • paulcdb@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 hours ago

        that also don’t have ads.

        YET!

        What we need to be pushing is someone like Framework to build fixable TV’s. Plenty of companies now make PI compute style boards so give me a screen I can put my own PI compute style board in and flash my own software.

        Then if JelllyFin added in the tuner side, considering it already has the basics, you’d likely get a ton of business selling custom TV’s that are more useable then the crap we have now. Look how popular the fire sticks got!

        Makes me wish I had a few million to get a TV designed, make a batch but I think demand would be an issue… which begs the question, how is no-one doing it yet? 🤦‍♂️🙄

        • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          People that buy commercial displays won’t tolerate adware on their monitors. Can you imagine having a screen in a store and it suddenly displaying ads that are not for what the store sells itself? This ensures there will always be an healthy demand for ad free displays.

      • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Some premium brands like Bang & Olufsen sell TVs without adware,

        Well, their TVs start around $9k and get up to about $30k. That’d be kinda crazy if they play ads like other brands do.