• SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That’s just how electronics recycling is, though. The amount of labor it would take to save all those SMT and BGA components is ridiculous and, honestly, is a pretty specialized skill even if it is easy to learn. The logistics of scale really makes it unreasonable, especially when simpler components can be had for literal pennies. There’s a point where the material cost of the copper is worth more than the labor it takes to do anything else with the board, and it happens a lot sooner than you think.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think when the economics of destroying a thing is better than reusing a thing, we should maybe have some sort of incentives toward reuse.

      I get that the logistics of setting up what’s basically a secondary supply chain is difficult, but I’ve got to believe it would be for the better.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I get that the logistics of setting up what’s basically a secondary supply chain is difficult, but I’ve got to believe it would be for the better.

        hear me out: an org that guaranteed destruction of any residual data and ensured that no component or resource was wasted, was responsible nationwide for the collection of all e-waste into resource streams OR repair for reuse.

        I’m just saying, techpriests might make me reevaluate my views on organized religion.