• kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    You don’t believe that wealthier or stronger people can be abused? That’s absurd. In this case, everything I’ve seen indicates that the abuse was mutual, but there are definitely also cases where an abuse victim is bigger, stronger, etc. than their abuser. Implying that those victims are somehow deficient by virtue of being victims is reprehensible.

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t believe that wealthier or stronger people can be abused?

      Only the Sith deal in absolutes, but yes, I believe that the party with more power is likely to be the one who abuses. You may be aware that power is not just an indicator of abuse, but often the modality of abuse.

      The idea that Depp chooses partners who are younger than his shoes, and still gets overpowered and outmatched, calls into question not only his masculinity, but his ability to function in the world.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Only the Sith deal in absolutes, but yes, I believe that the party with more power is likely to be the one who abuses.

        That probably true, but we aren’t talking about statistics, we’re talking about an individual case.

        and still gets overpowered and outmatched, calls into question not only his masculinity,

        That’s just toxic masculinity masquerading as feminism. At worst, that attitude could even influence a man who’s an abuse victim to fight back with disproportionate force in the name of “defending his masculinity” and potentially seriously injure or even kill his abuser rather than seeking help and potentially seeing them rehabilitated. Shaming people for doing less violence is almost never a good idea.