Key Points:

  • Apple opposed a right-to-repair bill in Oregon, despite previously supporting a weaker one in California.
  • The key difference is Oregon’s restriction on “parts pairing,” which locks repairs to Apple or authorized shops.
  • Apple argues this protects security and privacy, but critics say it creates a repair monopoly and e-waste.
  • Apple claims their system eases repair and maintain data security, while Google doesn’t have such a requirement
  • Apple refused suggestions to revise the bill
  • Cybersecurity experts argue parts pairing is unnecessary for security and hinders sustainable repair.
  • Bappity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    no suprise here. it’s apple. they made a $3500 device that has been bricking itself and charging people $100 to fix it because it’s completely proprietary