Key Points:

  • Apple opposed a right-to-repair bill in Oregon, despite previously supporting a weaker one in California.
  • The key difference is Oregon’s restriction on “parts pairing,” which locks repairs to Apple or authorized shops.
  • Apple argues this protects security and privacy, but critics say it creates a repair monopoly and e-waste.
  • Apple claims their system eases repair and maintain data security, while Google doesn’t have such a requirement
  • Apple refused suggestions to revise the bill
  • Cybersecurity experts argue parts pairing is unnecessary for security and hinders sustainable repair.
  • Bonehead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    That’s a security risk that would allow dangerous 3rd party hardware to be paired with perfect Apple products.

    /s…if it’s really necessary.