• snooggums@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Pants have value in any climate.

    Pants can have value, they do not have inherent value.

    You’re looking for particular circumstances that mitigate or otherwise affect the inherent value of certain goods, though your scenarios depend on those goods having inherent value in the first place.

    I am pointing out that there are exceptions to the assumption that there is inherent value to show that material goods do not have inherent value. That is the opposite of ‘depending on them having inherent value’.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re looking for particular circumstances that mitigate or otherwise detrimentally affect the inherent value of certain goods, though your scenarios depend on those goods having inherent value in the first place.

      Clothing has inherent value for people.

      Containers have inherent value.

      Shoes, any number of material goods have inherent value.

      Currencies do not.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I don’t think you understand what inherent means.

        If something does not always have value in every circumstance, the value is not inherent.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          In the context that we’re using the phrase and have even explicitly stated, “…to people”, these material goods…and food(that’s use your craziest argument so far) have inherent value.

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Do you think I’m talking about inherent value to dogs and cats?

            I’m going to assume you are trolling and kick myself for falling for it.

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              No, that’s my point? Currencies do not have an inherent value to people, only societal, while material goods have inherent value to people while you’re pretending they don’t while you struggle against a definition.

              Struggle!