Okay, I decided to give you another chance and came back to read the rest
but if we vote for democrats who are in reality moderates
wow, you’re the meme. I am afraid of getting an aneurysm from reading the rest of your fascist doublethink “genocide is moderate we have to vote for the democrats so we can get rid of the extreme republicans because they’re doing genocide” line of argument.
Republicans (red) are a united party while leftist groups are split between democrats (blue) and true leftists (green). this gives power to Republicans.
Well, again, (you really seem to struggle with reading what I write, I have to repeat myself quite a lot. Are you okay? Do you have a trusted adult or some sort of DNC botfarm handler you can talk to?), my issue with the republicans is not that they are republican it is their policies, which are similar to the democrats, so one party or the other in power is the same to me. The less power I can give them the better, so I won’t vote for either.
your vote for a party that cannot win in the short term… is just really a vote for nazis, pedophiles, rapists, and genocide lovers.
So if my vote if what makes the difference between the democrats winning or losing and you know I won’t vote for the democrats, why are you voting for them? That’s just voting for republicans, since the dems are bound to lose.
Also you seem to be stuck in a weird limbo, are we doing short term thinking or long term thinking? Voting for anyone but genociders will mean we don’t win in the short term, so therefore it’s bad. But we have to vote for democrats because of some effect that can only come to pass in the long term, which is why we must accept the unacceptable in the short term? If I have to accept the unacceptable (genocide) in the short term anyway, I might as well go for an actually cogent long-term plan that has not been shown to fail - Like voting for democrats the last three decades has.
Okay, I decided to give you another chance and came back to read the rest
wow, you’re the meme. I am afraid of getting an aneurysm from reading the rest of your fascist doublethink “genocide is moderate we have to vote for the democrats so we can get rid of the extreme republicans because they’re doing genocide” line of argument.
Well, again, (you really seem to struggle with reading what I write, I have to repeat myself quite a lot. Are you okay? Do you have a trusted adult or some sort of DNC botfarm handler you can talk to?), my issue with the republicans is not that they are republican it is their policies, which are similar to the democrats, so one party or the other in power is the same to me. The less power I can give them the better, so I won’t vote for either.
So if my vote if what makes the difference between the democrats winning or losing and you know I won’t vote for the democrats, why are you voting for them? That’s just voting for republicans, since the dems are bound to lose.
Also you seem to be stuck in a weird limbo, are we doing short term thinking or long term thinking? Voting for anyone but genociders will mean we don’t win in the short term, so therefore it’s bad. But we have to vote for democrats because of some effect that can only come to pass in the long term, which is why we must accept the unacceptable in the short term? If I have to accept the unacceptable (genocide) in the short term anyway, I might as well go for an actually cogent long-term plan that has not been shown to fail - Like voting for democrats the last three decades has.