God is love just don’t ask for the receipts

He’s all powerful except for whenever

How many Jesus, the Living Embodiment of YHWH, does it take to change a lightbulb

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Not at all. Jesus was all about people helping other people. God interfering in the affairs of man would impede their free will, but people helping people would be them exercising their free will.

      • CXORA@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That doesn’t make sense.

        If i choose to murder someone i am impeding their free will.

        If god chooses to save someone from murder, then it impedes the free will of the murderer.

        Why is only one of those a problem?

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s like the difference between the government punishing you for free speech and a Lemmy mod banning you.

          • CXORA@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            In your example the outcomes are different. What if the only difference was the actor who stopped the murder, would that still make a difference?

            Eg: if i trip a murderer so they can’t kill the victim, vs if god causes a murderer to trip. Ia one of those violating free will and a other one not?

            • village604@adultswim.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Maybe it’ll help to think about it in terms of an experiment. God is the scientist and humans are the test subjects. If the scientist interferes with the test subjects, the data loses meaning, but if the test subjects interfere with each other it’s just part of the experiment.

              Basically: supreme authority interfering = bad.

              • CXORA@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Except an all knowing entity has absolutely no reason to run experiments. This is a bad analogy.

                • village604@adultswim.fan
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  It’s not a bad analogy, you’re just not understanding the core concept that a higher power interfering is different than interpersonal interactions.

                  • CXORA@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    16 hours ago

                    Or maybe it is a bad analogy, and the reason I don’t understand your position is that it doesn’t make sense.