• Euphoma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t understand what I’m reading. Is it just like datacenters in africa or did they make an alternative to http/https

  • Dave.@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Dear article writers:

    PLEASE STOP ANTHROPOMORPHISING CORPORATE ENTITIES.

    They can’t feel terror, or anger, or ‘slam’ some other corporate opponent.

    As an entity, they can make decisions and take actions. Assigning them emotional range gives too much credibility to soulless money making machines whose sole purpose is to create value for their investors.

    • Moltz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Just one more thing you can thank Google for. Titles wouldn’t be made like this if Google didn’t reward them with traffic.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Google’s probably not going to care and is probably going to find some way to disadvantage this so they can keep their monopoly.

    I mean, this is the company that’s wide open about how weasely and underhanded they are to the web at large.

  • limer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This is really exciting: hundreds of millions now keep their internet data inside Africa and are no longer hostage to large companies outside of it

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yes, but an network limited locally isn’t an alternative, what it needed are global alternatives to the US BigBrother hegemony. The Africa network is nice for African people, but isn’t an alternative and less an “terror” for Google.

      • Ferk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        As I understand it, it’s not limited locally. Africa’s Continental Internet Exchange (CIX) connects Africa internally first, but it still links globally. It’s about sovereignty, not isolation.

        In terms of networking, this is not different from Europe and other regions with many local IXPs that allow regional traffic within the continent… the thing is that in the past, Africa has not had an infrastructure that allowed connecting to another African country without it being routed through international networks outside the continent.

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Ah, ok, anyway it is mandatory to end the US hegemony in the web, currently more than ever.

      • limer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Like you said, the headline is overhyped a bit.

        But still exciting because it’s a very important first step. Data colonization is being stopped. Nothing could be done until then.

        It also puts hard limits on the expansion of the tech bro billionaires

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    devoid of western influence

    Let me guess its paid for and run by China and the service looks cheap now but will grow more expensive.

    They should have explained African Digital Protocol (ADP) more because from my brief searching this is not “its own internet” its just non US owned datacenters and telcos.