It’s not a straw man. It’s a hypothetical. Feel free to answer it when you want.
Also, what do you mean about policies? If Trump didn’t change his policies and nuked California, would you then still say that Biden and Trump are equally as bad?
By virtue of you not addressing my two hypotheticals, I have now decided that you would respond to the nuking of California by Trump with both Biden and Trump are the same. Which is an insane position to have, which is probably why you’re not answering the hypotheticals in the first place. Because you know it’s insane, and yet you still hold that position.
I noticed you also dodged my question about policy versus outcomes.
It’s pretty clear that you don’t care and you’re just a troll or an idiot.
You’d be doing everyone a favor, scratch that, possibly saving some lives, by getting your jollies off on trolling something other than politics.
It’s not a straw man. It’s a hypothetical. Feel free to answer it when you want.
Also, what do you mean about policies? If Trump didn’t change his policies and nuked California, would you then still say that Biden and Trump are equally as bad?
That’s what a strawman is, dumbass.
A hypothetical is not a straw man.
By virtue of you not addressing my two hypotheticals, I have now decided that you would respond to the nuking of California by Trump with both Biden and Trump are the same. Which is an insane position to have, which is probably why you’re not answering the hypotheticals in the first place. Because you know it’s insane, and yet you still hold that position.
I noticed you also dodged my question about policy versus outcomes.
It’s pretty clear that you don’t care and you’re just a troll or an idiot.
You’d be doing everyone a favor, scratch that, possibly saving some lives, by getting your jollies off on trolling something other than politics.
I see no further reason to reply on this thread.
Have a nice life.
Hahaha. Applying for Kirk’s old job? This must be satire.