wikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1199arrow-down17
arrow-up1192arrow-down1external-linkHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comwikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squaresalty_chief@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down25·14 hours agoI don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·14 hours agoTheir point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia. It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
minus-squareGrammarPolice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·12 hours agoBait used to be believable
minus-squareBalder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·13 hours agoYou toll totally misunderstood the comment.
minus-squarebusyconstruction13@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours agodeleted by creator
minus-squaresalty_chief@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·10 hours agoYep, graduated!
I don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
Their point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia.
It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
Bait used to be believable
You toll totally misunderstood the comment.
deleted by creator
Yep, graduated!