• PigeonEnjoyer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yup, privacy (and many other things) should be done to ones ability and not to ability of others.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They’re the ones foisting their requirements on others. Somebody shares what they do, and the purists come storming in with their righteous condescension. Nobody asked for that negativity.

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          55 minutes ago

          In this case, your assessment is fair - user is harsh, name-calls, and does talk down to the person they were responding to/the reader. I got lost in the chain.

          Regardless, accusations of purity testing come up more than enough online for my liking and it isn’t always in response to righteous condescension, as you aptly described the user’s behavior in this example.