i just find it so annoying when specific statements are generalized to turn an argument around. it’s the typical internet argument of “oh you like pancakes? why do you hate waffles? don’t you know more people like waffles? why are you shitting on them like this? you asshole”
what i see when i scroll up is you pivoting from “this specific guy is a hypocrite” to “someone saying this after having done that is a hypocrite” and condemning that. but those two things are not equivalent at all.
no? i’m talking about a single person. i’m not generalising in any way.
nowhere did i state that any of the things he’s done are wrong or right, simply that he has inconsistent beliefs. my own beliefs did not come into it.
What you center in discourse is part of the message tho.
elaborate.
I cant tell if youre being obtuse and tedious or genuinely curious here
But have you stopped beating your wife?
i just find it so annoying when specific statements are generalized to turn an argument around. it’s the typical internet argument of “oh you like pancakes? why do you hate waffles? don’t you know more people like waffles? why are you shitting on them like this? you asshole”
Im against splash damage.
what’s the splash damage from calling snoop a hypocrite?
Scroll up. This was explained. If you think it was not adequately explained; we do not need to speak.
what i see when i scroll up is you pivoting from “this specific guy is a hypocrite” to “someone saying this after having done that is a hypocrite” and condemning that. but those two things are not equivalent at all.