• myslsl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It seems like you should understand my point/position before you reply to me if you want this conversation to be productive? Why is understanding those things irrelevant to you?

    • Gabu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why is understanding those things irrelevant to you?

      Because philosophy, debate and logic were part of the basic school curriculum when I was a kid, and as a result I understand your particular subjective perpective is irrelevant to this conversation…

      • myslsl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        How do you know my point is subjective if you do not understand my point in the first place?

        • Gabu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because you’re oh-so-focused on whether I think you believe a god or not.

          • myslsl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m “oh-so-focused” on that because you’re “oh-so-focused” on telling me about “empirical investigations” that disprove the existence of gods, which have literally nothing at all to do with my point.

            • Gabu@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I see - the issue here is that you’re functionally illiterate.

              • myslsl@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                The lack of reading comprehension here is definitely on your end.

                Me (sans-snarkyness) in the original comment you replied to: “Hey, the field of philosophy where this stuff is studied is called philosophy of religion. Proofs for and against the existence of a god have been critiqued to shit there. You should read about it.”

                You: “Oh yeah! Well I can disprove any god you like.”

                Congrats? Do you want a gold star or something?

                Go study philosophy of religion. These kinds of proofs and disproofs are part of that field along with their critiques. That’s the point I’m making in the comment you originally replied to. Nothing about my point is subjective.

                • Gabu@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  As I stated, you’re functionally illiterate. I’d recommend reviewing your basic literature curriculum from the start.

                  From

                  Point me to a god and I’ll dismantle them.

                  You understood

                  Well I can disprove any god you like.

                  Instead of the well established concept

                  Any supernatural phenomenon, upon rigorous delineation, becomes provably false

                  • myslsl@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Sorry for getting your panties in a twist over paraphrasing your totally irrelevant point. Please understand, I don’t give a shit about what you think you can prove or disprove.

                    Any supernatural phenomenon, upon rigorous delineation, becomes provably false

                    Great point, one of the MAJOR challenges with arguments about whether a god does or does not exist is that the whole notion of a god is incredibly vague and not “rigorously delineated” in a general sense. Literally any introductory course in philosophy of religion would point this out.