• Rose@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    As much as Steam is free to host what it likes, Visa and the others are free not to work with Steam. You could argue the options available to Steam would be significantly limited by that, but the same argument is being used against Steam now in the Wolfire lawsuit. The argument is that Steam violates antitrust law via illegal tying and other means, making it hard for a user who doesn’t agree with their content policies to switch to a different platform, like Epic, which has always prohibited porn games.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I don’t think a single person here is disputing the fact that they can legally do this. There’s a lot of things that are legal which are immoral.

      It isn’t the payment processor’s place, ESPECIALLY one that we have allowed to have a de facto monopoly on credit card processing, to use that position in order to dictate morality.

      From a pragmatic perspective, they’re playing with fire by giving in to small but vocal extremist groups. Public outcry on issues can result in laws and regulations which would limit how payment processors can operate. We could pass laws which make it illegal for a payment processor to refuse to process payments for otherwise legal transactions.