• Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    😆 I can’t believe how absolutely silly a lot of you sound with this.

    LLM is a tool. It’s output is dependent on the input. If that’s the quality of answer you’re getting, then it’s a user error. I guarantee you that LLM answers for many problems are definitely adequate.

    It’s like if a carpenter said the cabinets turned out shit because his hammer only produces crap.

    Also another person commented that seen the pattern you also see means we’re psychotic.

    All I’m trying to suggest is Lemmy is getting seriously manipulated by the media attitude towards LLMs and these comments I feel really highlight that.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      If that’s the quality of answer you’re getting, then it’s a user error

      No, I know the data I gave it and I know how hard I tried to get it to use it truthfully.

      You have an irrational and wildly inaccurate belief in the infallibility of LLMs.

      You’re also denying the evidence of my own experience. What on earth made you think I would believe you over what I saw with my own eyes?