• MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I have actually been doing this lately: iteratively prompting AI to write software and fix its errors until something useful comes out. It’s a lot like machine translation. I speak fluent C++, but I don’t speak Rust, but I can hammer away on the AI (with English language prompts) until it produces passable Rust for something I could write for myself in C++ in half the time and effort.

    I also don’t speak Finnish, but Google Translate can take what I say in English and put it into at least somewhat comprehensible Finnish without egregious translation errors most of the time.

    Is this useful? When C++ is getting banned for “security concerns” and Rust is the required language, it’s at least a little helpful.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m impressed you can make strides with Rust with AI. I am in a similar boat, except I’ve found LLMs are terrible with Rust.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I was 0/6 on various trials of AI for Rust over the past 6 months, then I caught a success. Turns out, I was asking it to use a difficult library - I can’t make the thing I want work in that library either (library docs say it’s possible, but…) when I posed a more open ended request without specifying the library to use, it succeeded - after a fashion. It will give you code with cargo build errors, I copy-paste the error back to it like “address: <pasted error message>” and a bit more than half of the time it is able to respond with a working fix.