• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Right, but if you’re in a situation where you need emergency services, chances are you won’t be in a situation to call. For the vanishingly low chance of that being necessary (esp. in my case where I take them to/from school since there’s no bus service), I trust strangers to call since my area is sufficiently densely populated for someone to see what happened.

    If you live in an area where such things are more likely, I absolutely agree that you should be able to make that choice. I firmly oppose any school-wide ban on phones for that reason, I just happen to agree that, generally speaking, kids don’t need and shouldn’t have phones.

    And if you really feel the need for your kid to contact you or emergency services, there are devices like Gabb watches that have only the functions you need. So please, consider those before considering a smartphone.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Kids shouldn’t have smartphones no, but it can he handy for a group of kinds to have at least some kind of phone. Heck even a phone without a sim can be used to call 112.