• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    What? You use a secure messenger to send secure messages. It doesn’t make sense for a secure messenger to offer sending insecure messages (SMS).

    Edit: oh, you’re probably referring to why it requires a phone number. This seems to be due to abuse/spam prevention, as otherwise creating new accounts to spam people with is basically free.

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      using the phone number is still a pretty unnecessary risk, imho.

      there’s no real need for it any longer.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Do you have a better approach to prevent spam in mind? Without a barrier of entry it becomes a serious issue.

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Spam prevention? Ive got spam on Signal. Having your phone number be the barrier of entry doesn’t make Signal a flawless app.

          and considering i can just plug a google voice number in, I’m not sure its the best barrier.