I don’t use an LLM as a primary source of information; this is just about a meme I don’t understand. Either I just let it explain it to me or… I don’t, and scroll further.
And genuinely, if you think it cannot, then explain it you to me. I doubt that it’s different than the explanation I got.
I feel like you do not understand the difference between asking for the meaning of a meme and doing actual research about a topic you want to learn something on. And if you really think those are the same… lmao.
I’m glad ChatGPT can explain stuff like that to me because I’ve never heard of Pedro Pascal before and initially assumed he was the man in the image.
ChatGPT can’t explain stuff like that. You should never use an LLM as a primary source of information or you will be misinformed sooner or later.
I don’t use an LLM as a primary source of information; this is just about a meme I don’t understand. Either I just let it explain it to me or… I don’t, and scroll further.
And genuinely, if you think it cannot, then explain it you to me. I doubt that it’s different than the explanation I got.
“I don’t use it as a primary source of information, I just learn from it before looking at information anywhere else.”
I feel like you do not understand the difference between asking for the meaning of a meme and doing actual research about a topic you want to learn something on. And if you really think those are the same… lmao.
This gives big “I know the Bible is true, because the Bible says so!” Energy.
Finally someone gets it. The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.
Please see the comments further above to know why this is widely considered dumbassery.
Of course it’s dumbassery. Too many people taking me seriously or as a reliable source of information, when I cut out half of its answer.
Poes Law, use a /s next time