

That’s some extreme cognitive dissonance, bro.
That’s some extreme cognitive dissonance, bro.
Uh…
No. Completely different statue.
The fact that you can see that graph and not realize the impact Citizens United court decision has, that the DNC consistently campaigned on reversing, is astonishing. It’s like seeing somebody with every piece of the puzzle fail to put it together.
Oh I see the confusion now, thanks.
I think you might have Mamdani confused with somebody else.
What is all four, tf are you talking about?
The DNC at least recognize Gaza’s right to live, by allowing Trump in office the official stance became death or exodus according to Pete Hegseth.
If you care about Palestinian life or suffering at all then you need to promote the DNC.
Captain, the goalpost is running away!
Small Dollar donations mean individuals, like when a granny gives $15 to Bernie Sanders. Since that explicitly says matching with public financing that means said matching would have an upper limit allotted to every candidate.
It says businesses and corporations won’t be allowed to donate to campaigns or collaborate with campaigns. That leaves a loophole where they can still endorse a candidate publicly, but taking that away would be a violation of freedom of speech.
PACs will still exist in the sense that political advocates and lobbies exist, but they would be severely gutted by not being able to fund campaigns, which is their sole purpose since the Citizens United decision was first handed down.
You were clearly sarcastic by saying “vote for dnc because” followed by a claim that they were bought and paid for by corporate and Tesla, so you did say not to vote for the DNC.
The DNC haven’t had more than 48 senators in 10 years and shortly before that when they had 60, only with caucus, for about a month of congress in session they passed medicaid expansion to tens of millions of Americans. If it weren’t for the Independent Lieberman they would have passed singlepayer.
You seem to really admire MAGAs for walking and talking unfathomable cruelty and destruction on basis of racial and theological supremacy.
See my example said nothing about their names but instead their actions, your example does the exact opposite.
There was a particular statue of two pairs of arms hugging representing MLK Jr and his wife Corretta that inspired the exact opposite feelings, apparently, as many onlookers mistakenly thought it was something more obscene.
I think it’s a bit worse than that. While I think at least a few people are actually ignorant, I think there is a well funded and organized campaign to keep the DNC out of power, I think some of it is from within the USA but a lot of it is from Russia and China.
There are Psyops on Lemmy.
The comment is still up on my instance, this is what you said
YEAH! SO VOTE DNC Because something something corporate…oh shit they just took another donation from Tesla…something something regulation…something something “we need to mend fences”.
Anyway, do you laugh when you go fuck yourself, clown?
Well I have some great news because the DNC also want to reform election finances to remove private funding. You should vote for the DNC.
No it doesn’t, it explicitly says they “will ban all private financing from federal elections.”
So the RNC are allowed to fundraise and hold concerts and ad campaigns but the DNC are not?
It’s core policy platform, page 48 of their official manifesto and it’s been publicly stated by pretty much every DNC to reverse Citizens United. They’re also the only party to try to pass any antibribery and anticorruption laws in the last couple of decades, such was the case with HR 1 For the People Act.
Okay but people thought the arms thing was a depiction of fellatio, so not remotely similar in reception.