• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sure, to a certain extent. But having an ability to opt out is far healthier than the walled gardens we have now.

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      In theory. In reality you’re bringing feather dusters to a nuclear bomb fight. A handful of hobbyists hosting instances with how many users? Couple hundred thousand? Against a 100 Billion dollar company with 3 Billion people? Yea good luck with that.

      • Kethal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        How do you think this works? Yes, Meta will partake in the Fediverse. No one is trying to stop that. That chart won’t get to 100% and no one cares if it does. People are just ensuring that there’s a place where Meta won’t be, and you don’t need billions to do that.

        • GluWu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Look at a pie chart of “internet users of x type platform” from pre fediverse. If original internet dies and fedi does take off, it will be the same chart but they will be instances instead of www sites. There are still plenty of those prefacebook, premyspace forums on the www, it’s just only a few people use them.