• SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s wild to me that this is so often called “just business” when, described this way, it’s textbook racketeering.

    • AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Could you explain to me how “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” could be perceived as racketeering, let alone “textbook?”

      • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” and there’s “intentionally sabotage the work/service provided in order to extract more profits.”

        • AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          “The work or service provided for free?” If so what’s the difference? If you’re getting something for free you have no right to complain

          • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            But it’s not free, just because you aren’t paying in money doesn’t mean you aren’t paying for it in other ways.