• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    That relies on their detection actually detecting the right piece.

    I once recorded myself playing Beethoven’s “Pathetique” sonata, mvt 2. It gave me a strike for a recording of Beethoven’s “Moonlight” sonata, mvt 1.

    edit: of course, in both cases, the thing is public domain, and no company has any right to claim copyright on it. The fact that YouTube lets them is fucking criminal. And it was the piece itself that copyright was being claimed on, not the recording.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I really wish there was some form of user protection in regards to DMCA. The claimant should be required to face penalties for false claims. IP holders are not damaged by stolen content as significantly as smaller users who have had claims made against them, regardless of legitimacy.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        There are protections against false DMCA claims. I think a false DMCA claim is actually perjury.

        The thing is though, the vast majority of claims on YouTube are not DMCA. YouTube has their own extra-legal system called Content ID. Where a DMCA claim carries the force of law and requires the allegedly infringing content be removed from the platform, claims under Content ID are essentially a contract with YouTube, and they give the claimant the choice of taking the video down, muting it (if the allegedly infringing content is audio), or monetising it and taking all the money for the claimant. They can also do different things by region, which is why at least historically a lot of videos were taken down in Germany but available elsewhere.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, and I own that copyright, because it’s my performance.

        The claim wasn’t against the recording though. It was against the composition.

  • sino@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve tried this twice for songs, but they are so niche even YouTube is unable to copyright strike them.

  • Flaimbot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    fastest? dunno bout that. last time i got a notification like 10 yrs after my video was uploaded

  • 520@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Doesn’t work. Most copyright bots will incorrectly label your music as something else to get their strike in.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I like the fact that a couple of times I’ve printed misheard lyrics, there were sites dedicated to that. I believe the last time it was something from RHCP that I’ve seen misattributed to another band.