From their own internal metrics, tech giants have long known what independent research now continuously validates: that the content that is most likely to go viral is that which induces strong feelings such as outrage and disgust, regardless of its underlying veracity. Moreover, they also know that such content is heavily engaged with and most profitable. Far from acting against false, harmful content, they placed profits above its staggering—and damaging—social impact to implicitly encourage it while downplaying the massive costs.

Social media titans embrace essentially the same hypocrisy the tobacco industry embodied when they feigned concern over harm reduction while covertly pushing their product ever more aggressively. With the reelection of Trump, our tech giants now no longer even pretend to care.

Engagement is their business model, and doubt about the harms they cause is their product. Tobacco executives, and their bought-off scientists, once proclaimed uncertainty over links between cigarettes and lung cancer. Zuckerberg has likewise testified to Congress, “The existing body of scientific work has not shown a causal link between using social media and young people having worse mental health, ” even while studies find self-harm, eating disorder and misogynistic material spreads on these platform unimpeded. This equivocation echoes protestations of tobacco companies that there was no causal evidence of smoking harms, even as incontrovertible evidence to the contrary rapidly amassed.

  • dwazou@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Getting a dumbphone was one of the best decisions I took in my life. It helps me focus better and read books. I don’t actually need the internet with me 24/7. If you really need me, you can call.

    Try it. Some people will call you crazy. Just ignore them.

    • magz :3@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      i’m curious, what exactly is the advantage of getting a dumbphone vs just uninstalling social media apps from your existing phone, or just disabling internet access all together? doesn’t that achieve pretty much the same thing while still being able to keep things like navigation and being able to see when public transport is delayed

    • EvilBit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I got an e-ink e-reader in the pocketable form factor of a phone (Bigme Hibreak Color). Instead of doomscrolling social media, I read a couple paragraphs of the Oppenheimer biography. Next I’ll reread Neuromancer. It’s life-changing. 10/10 highly recommended.

      • Waphles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Cool! What made you chose that over something like the boox that is the same form factor but without phone functionality?

        • EvilBit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Color screen and the fact that Onyx, the makers of Boox, flagrantly violate GPL terms.

          But it was the Boox Palma getting publicity that made me aware of the form factor and start digging. I’m super happy with the Bigme Hibreak, but I don’t have a SIM card in it. I mostly use it in airplane mode as a dumb e-reader and don’t even install any apps besides the minimum needed to do that.

          • Waphles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Ah ok, so do you carry a smartphone as well? I wonder what it would be like to completely rely on the bigme

            • EvilBit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I do. It’s not ideal but it still gives me something better to do than social media.

              I’ve heard it’s quirky and kinda mid as a phone, but not unusable.

    • Tregetour@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      People tend to interact with technology on a default permit basis, which is partly why they have weather-vane attention spans and obliterated focusing capacity. They’re like Pavlov’s dog, responding to every notification and ping and service update; and social media is treated as the default use state until something else yells for their attention.

      I have notifications denied by default. Notifications are lame and a known privacy threat. No one needs to be bothered because someone responded in a group chat or a new post surfaced on a Lemmy comm or a ‘deal alert’ got pushed by some marketing dipshit on the other side of the planet. That they exist at all for email is ludicrous. Email is an asychronous protocol - delayed responses are a feature.

      Stop giving this stuff attention on demand and start allocating attention windows where it will get seen to. Email that gets in front of your eyes is 99 per cent transaction stubs if you’re doing it right; there is no more reason to pay it any attention outside 7pm for 10 or 15 minutes (say). Similar treatment should apply to most messaging to be honest.