• upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I’m a bit surprised that this request is creating so much friction. This to me, is just a run of the mill “help me find a free download of this software” request that shows up all the time here.

    I’m not comfortable trying to build this myself. I am happy to just use the inactive Clementine media player this is forked off of if people are really so offended by my request.

    I totally understand why the dev wants to be paid, I’m just not going to be the one to do it.

    • Christian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yeah I don’t have an answer for the thing you’re actually asking (sorry) but this is 100% a reasonable take and honestly I fully approve of their approach here. Strawberry is licensed under the GPL, it is libre software and can be packaged in any FOSS operating system without issue. This adds to the free software community. They are explicitly only selling to people who don’t value free software enough to use a free operating system.

      And to be clear, I can guarantee that no one loses sleep over piracy of their GPL software, otherwise it wouldn’t be GPL. I see it more as a way for the devs to wash their hands of troubleshooting for operating systems they don’t want to care about - anyone on windows/mac who cares enough about strawberry to pay gets listened to, but otherwise you’ve created an easy excuse for ignoring the extra work.

      As an aside it’s my preferred player on linux, good software.

  • mooncake@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Is there a particular reason why you want strawberry? It looks ugly why not go for something like musicbee

    • upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Originally I just wanted to try a FOSS media player and found Clementine to be the most reliable when it came to importing music and reading the tags. This was especially true when grabbing old music files off an iPod then importing them.

      When I realized clementine is basically dead, wanted to see how strawberry compared.

      Side note, I enjoy the outdated aesthetic. 😋

      I would probably use MediaMonkey if I was going to go the non FOSS route.

  • M.int@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I looked around a bit and couldn’t find it…
    Here is a big list of Software sites, maybe some else has better luck. (Also couldn’t find anything via DHT crawlers and Soulseek).

    You could try runnig it via WSL, since the Linux version is free and up-to-date.

    • alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If you are planning to use it via WSL, you’ll need to setup pulse audio server for audio and X server for GUI both of which ain’t hard and you can access files on your windows system from the path something like “/mnt/d/music/”.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Jesus fucking Christ …GitHub actions is free for open source.

      And they still put their binaries behind a paywall?

    • ISOmorph@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      And a music player probably doesn’t need to be bleeding edge either. So it’s pretty much a one off thing.

  • pablodaniel@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    “Access to macOS and Windows releases are currently restricted to sponsors, a 5 USD monthly sponsorship is required.”

    Really scummy on their part.

    You should be able to build from source yourself to get a Windows version, although the process looks like a pain in the ass.

    Curse whoever floated the idea to lock releases behind paywalls. We should not encourage this behavior.

    Do not give them your money.

    • upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      To each their own.

      I think its reasonable that a one man dev team wants a bit of money for their time. They gave good reasons as to why and as others have said you could compile it yourself. I just don’t know how and am a bit intimidated by the tutorial.

      To me, personally, paying for this type of program when my use case is very casual, isn’t worth it to me.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Really scummy on their part.

      Anyone is free to build it themselves. Someone could even distribute their own build from the same source under a different name completely legally.

      They bank on users being lazy and then pay for the convenience.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Anyone is free to build it themselves. Someone could even distribute their own build from the same source under a different name completely legally.

        You could just as easily in the spirit of this community do it with the same name and code, same way they do it for cracked games. Don’t tell me it’s not done because there are security concerns, you have no way to tell if cracked games contain secret malware in them yet people still distribute and download those.

        They bank on users being lazy and then pay for the convenience.

        And also pirates to not outright rip them off, which seems to be working for some reason…

      • upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I don’t think that’s true, correct me if I am wrong though. There are still other requirements you have to follow for the GPL3 license if you wanted to distribute it legally.

      • Geodad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Is it that hard to compile from source on Windows? I’ve been on Linux for 20 years, so I genuinely don’t know.

        • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 minutes ago

          No idea. Haven’t used Windows for anything other than games for around 20 years either. How hard it is isn’t really the point, though.

        • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I don’t think compiling from source is easy even on Linux. Whenever I try it whatever program I’m trying to compile just refuses to compile, even though I seem to have all of the necessary programs for it. I can’t recall successfully compiling anything other than suckless tools, which have basically no dependencies.

          • Geodad@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I don’t know. The only time I’ve had significant issues was with Arch. Debian has always been good to me inbthat regard.

    • Jakob Fel@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I understand restricting the macOS version because it costs money but doing this for Windows is just a scumbag tactic, to be sure.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      we also have to pay for a Apple developer account for signed macOS releases

      Sounds like you should blame Apple, not the dev.

      • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They also don’t have to sign it.

        Maybe I’ve just used MacOS so long that I’m out of touch, but installing unsigned applications is effectively a mild annoyance.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Not specifically. It sounds like they’re not really interested in maintaining a Windows version, so for that they charge. Generally I think people should be compensated for their labor, even though that might be an unpopular opinion in this community.

          • pablodaniel@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            So, why even mention apple if you’re going to justify the developer’s actions anyways?

            I’m going to go back to blaming the devs now. Nice try defending the people taking money from you. They’re banking on your low standards.

            • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              6 hours ago

              They’re banking on your low standards.

              Yeah this is unfortunately common, and many people are quick to defend developers like that making excuses.