Looking for a place to find the Windows version of this without paying $20 for a single version or $5/month for regular updates.

  • upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 minutes ago

    I’m a bit surprised that this request is creating so much friction. This to me, is just a run of the mill “help me find a free download of this software” request that shows up all the time here.

    I’m not comfortable trying to build this myself. I am happy to just use the inactive Clementine media player this is forked off of if people are really so offended by my request.

    I totally understand why the dev wants to be paid, I’m just not going to be the one to do it.

    • ISOmorph@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      And a music player probably doesn’t need to be bleeding edge either. So it’s pretty much a one off thing.

  • pablodaniel@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    “Access to macOS and Windows releases are currently restricted to sponsors, a 5 USD monthly sponsorship is required.”

    Really scummy on their part.

    You should be able to build from source yourself to get a Windows version, although the process looks like a pain in the ass.

    Curse whoever floated the idea to lock releases behind paywalls. We should not encourage this behavior.

    Do not give them your money.

    • upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 minutes ago

      To each their own.

      I think its reasonable that a one man dev team wants a bit of money for their time. They gave good reasons as to why and as others have said you could compile it yourself. I just don’t know how and am a bit intimidated by the tutorial.

      To me, personally, paying for this type of program when my use case is very casual, isn’t worth it to me.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Really scummy on their part.

      Anyone is free to build it themselves. Someone could even distribute their own build from the same source under a different name completely legally.

      They bank on users being lazy and then pay for the convenience.

      • Geodad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Is it that hard to compile from source on Windows? I’ve been on Linux for 20 years, so I genuinely don’t know.

        • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t think compiling from source is easy even on Linux. Whenever I try it whatever program I’m trying to compile just refuses to compile, even though I seem to have all of the necessary programs for it. I can’t recall successfully compiling anything other than suckless tools, which have basically no dependencies.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      we also have to pay for a Apple developer account for signed macOS releases

      Sounds like you should blame Apple, not the dev.

      • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        They also don’t have to sign it.

        Maybe I’ve just used MacOS so long that I’m out of touch, but installing unsigned applications is effectively a mild annoyance.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Not specifically. It sounds like they’re not really interested in maintaining a Windows version, so for that they charge. Generally I think people should be compensated for their labor, even though that might be an unpopular opinion in this community.

          • pablodaniel@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            So, why even mention apple if you’re going to justify the developer’s actions anyways?

            I’m going to go back to blaming the devs now. Nice try defending the people taking money from you. They’re banking on your low standards.

            • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 hours ago

              They’re banking on your low standards.

              Yeah this is unfortunately common, and many people are quick to defend developers like that making excuses.