• ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Bluesky is like a mini example of why Communism and Capitalism does not work. Centralization is a drug.

    Editing to explain as some did not make the connection. This is a comment about centralization that even when a system has the best intentions like communism and in this case Blusky, centralization still will lead to corruption as anything centralized is ripe for takeover as power is a drug.

    • moth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Bluesky is literally an example of enshittification under capitalism. Go away

    • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      What exactly a website related to Jack Dorsey has anything to do with Communism lol

        • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Of course he isn’t, but he was a huge part at the start and the project as a whole still has Dorsey’s ideas all over it.

      • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Just that good intentions to become decentralized do not work. Not saying capitalism is better as they are two sides of the same centralized coin.

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      You can not make any commentary on Communism here. You will get down voted even if your criticism was correct. Probably even more so and the reason why this is likely to get downvoted out of hand, as well.

      Edit: Proven right. Yet again

      • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Intelligent commentary on Communism is one thing, lunatic gibberish is of course going to be downvoted.

        • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          “Even if your critism was correct…”

          Either way, even me touching on the notion is enough to get downvoted. Proof is my post.

      • Gibibit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        This whole comment thread sucks lol. The top reaction literally just says “go away”. Talk about wannabe authoritarian tankies

      • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That is ok. I have never had an issue sharing facts that may trigger some. In fact the only reason it triggers some is it hits somewhere deep.

            • sexy_peach@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              All of it? Your definition of communism is the same as that of the failed dictatorships of the 20th century.

              When most people nowadays talk about socialism or communism they talk about a democracy in the workplace and in politics. People who want a strong state that owns everything are a loud minority in leftist circles, as you can see on lemmy. But they’re not as big in real life.

              • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Thanks for the reply. I am not understanding. What is the modern definition of communism then? Are you saying it is really about Socialism?

                • sexy_peach@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 hours ago

                  It’s a bit cliche but the first paragraph of wikipedia says it better than I could:

                  Communism (from Latin communis ‘common, universal’)[1][2] is a sociopolitical, philosophical, and economic ideology within the socialist movement,[1] whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered on common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange that allocates products in society based on need.[3][4][5] A communist society entails the absence of private property and social classes,[1] and ultimately money[6] and the state.[7][8][9]

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

                  My description above is just a quick way to point to the things that would change in our lived reality (assuming you live in a western democracy). You wouldn’t have to share your house or car or whatever. Just take responsibility for your workplace with colleagues, just like you vote in a democracy.

                  • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    I moved to Vietnam and thus I am confused about Communism. Seems to me that the state described in the wiki is the same end goal so have read about, but it just seems like we do not get there as humans with power do not want to let go even if the intentions are good. Like BluSky. They have a great vision and idea that reminds me of communism. First you have to have centralize to coordinate the decentralization…and then it never happens. It is why I really believe this only way to keep centralization in check is decentralization to balance the equation.