I cant think of a single thing they can build in the hands of a crazed idiot that wouldnt be better built in the hands of a trained professional.
Ai should, at most, be used to automate tedious, low risk work that anyone in the field could do, but would rather avoid. Examples like protein folding or brute forcing math proofs, really just things that can easily be programmed but are more grunt busywork than anything.
It should NOT be used for developing new features in code, discovering or finalizing math proofs, and most certainly, human expression via art.
Ai’s exclusive use should be to free humans to pursue passions, either by reducing work hours or tedium, ideally both.
The thing is the trained professional costs 300k a year (100k in low-income areas like Europe) to employ and a z.ai coding plan sub lowest tier is like 20 bucks a month and makes a ton of mistakes but works at least 10x faster so you get much faster iteration.
I cant think of a single thing they can build in the hands of a crazed idiot that wouldnt be better built in the hands of a trained professional.
Ai should, at most, be used to automate tedious, low risk work that anyone in the field could do, but would rather avoid. Examples like protein folding or brute forcing math proofs, really just things that can easily be programmed but are more grunt busywork than anything.
It should NOT be used for developing new features in code, discovering or finalizing math proofs, and most certainly, human expression via art.
Ai’s exclusive use should be to free humans to pursue passions, either by reducing work hours or tedium, ideally both.
The thing is the trained professional costs 300k a year (100k in low-income areas like Europe) to employ and a z.ai coding plan sub lowest tier is like 20 bucks a month and makes a ton of mistakes but works at least 10x faster so you get much faster iteration.