• brie@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    S7 will be retired or extended with access control. TOTP apps don’t work for edge cases like broken phone. Dedicated token devices get lost. SMS will continue being the main solution for 2FA.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Nah what we need is good privacy-focussed companies getting into the public IAM space.

      You know how you can sign into stuff with your Google or Facebook account? And get a 2FA push to your phone?

      Like that. Except by a company with a shred of ethics and morality. Like Proton.

      I do also think that we all should have a cryptographically secure federally issued identity for official uses such as signing documents or signing into financial accounts and other things that must use your official identity, and not an online pseudonym. Like SSN but on a smartcard. Basically CAC or ECA but for general civilian use.

      • brie@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Proton is already used for identity management: OTP via email. They’ll implement OAuth if there’s enough demand for it. A company’s purpose is to be profitable, ethics side is largely irrelevant.

        Many countries already have digital government ID: Australia, Estonia, Russia.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          A company’s purpose is to be profitable, ethics side is largely irrelevant.

          Maybe so, but companies such as Proton’s biggest asset is their reputation…a reputation of being privacy-focussed. Without that they are nothing, and they know that. As a result, they try to live up to that reputation as well as possible.

          Being as it was started by Sir Tim Berners-Lee (among some of CERN’s other founding fathers of the web) is just icing on the cake.

    • HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can use TOTP with multiple devices. For example with an app on your phone and something like KeePass on your laptop/desktop.

      Still not convenient since you don’t walk around with this in your pocket - but it doesn’t have to be just one point of failure.

      • brie@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        What about people who only have one device? Kids, elderly, people with only work computer.

        • HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I agree, it’s not a perfect system. Even if you do have multiple devices - you may be locked out if you lose your phone while traveling, can have multiple failures.

          Although I don’t know what is remotely secure and is elderly friendly. Email or SMS 2FA would have been the closest in mind, but it’s not secure, and plenty of elderly struggle with both.

          • brie@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Pedantic types always mention that secure is only relevant in the context of a particular threat model. The elderly can use hardware authentication like those RSA devices or ubikey. Unfortunately, this is expensive, and banks don’t believe there’s demand for that. Would you switch banks for this feature?

            • HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Im not terribly familiar with the HW keys; Are you able to get multiple keys? I would worry that it would be similar to TOTP, in that if you lose/misplace/don’t have the device then you would be locked out.

              And I probably wouldn’t switch banks for it, it would depend on how much more secure I perceived it and any other bank differences.

              • brie@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Yes, you can have multiple devices with the same seed for the pseudorandom number generator. You can turn any computer into a hardware authenticator. In practice, it depends on the bank or your employer. Google reduced phishing success rate to zero after switching to ubikey.

                As for perception, you really nailed it. It’s more important than actual difficulty of gaining access to your accounts. Remember that most articles are written by low skill blue teamers who manipulate your perception into thinking it’s really easy while they don’t possess the skills to do it. Always call them out in a manner like “you claim it’s easy, have you done it?”. They will always say no.